• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Advertize
  • Jobs
  • Courses
  • Contact
  • (0)
  • LoginRegister
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
      Articles
      News
      Events
      Job Posts
    • Twitter
Datafloq

Datafloq

Data and Technology Insights

  • Categories
    • Big Data
    • Blockchain
    • Cloud
    • Internet Of Things
    • Metaverse
    • Robotics
    • Cybersecurity
    • Startups
    • Strategy
    • Technical
  • Big Data
  • Blockchain
  • Cloud
  • Metaverse
  • Internet Of Things
  • Robotics
  • Cybersecurity
  • Startups
  • Strategy
  • Technical

U.S. defended Amazon after article showed company bypassed Indian law

Reuters / 4 min read.
May 21, 2021
floq.to/uzSr3

By Aditya Kalra and Steve Stecklow

NEW DELHI (Reuters) – U.S. officials rushed to defend Amazon’s business practices in India after Reuters reported in February that the company had favored certain sellers on its website and bypassed local law that requires foreign e-commerce companies to treat all vendors equally, documents obtained by the news agency show.

Emails obtained through the U.S. Freedom of Information Act from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) showed that U.S. officials prepared a note for John Kerry, a top envoy of President Joe Biden, about the Feb. 17 Reuters report. The note, contained in an email dated Feb. 18, said that India’s antitrust watchdog had reviewed many such allegations against U.S. e-commerce companies and found nothing wrong.

Biden’s envoy, former U.S. Secretary of State Kerry, is in charge of climate change policy. He was scheduled to speak that day with India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal. The U.S. government was concerned that Goyal would bring up the Reuters story, so it hastily drafted a note about the article in case he did, the emails show.

“This could come up in the call since as you know Minister Goyal is prone to bring up tangential topics,” Thomas Carnegie, a U.S. embassy official in New Delhi, emailed an official at the USTR.

Philip M. Ingeneri, another U.S. embassy official, also told the USTR official in an email on Feb. 18 that he had “verified” the contents of the note prepared for Kerry with Amazon India’s government affairs chief as “true and accurate.” The emails do not describe what ultimately happened during the Kerry-Goyal call.

The U.S. embassy in New Delhi referred questions to the U.S. Department of State in Washington, which said it expected that any issues regarding U.S. e-commerce companies’ practices in India would be reviewed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) “with the same level of independence, transparency, and professionalism it has demonstrated in the past.”

Spokespeople for Kerry, the USTR and Goyal did not respond to Reuters queries.

The Reuters report https://reut.rs/2OCOT2W in February, based on internal Amazon documents, revealed that the U.S. firm has for years given preferential treatment to a small group of sellers on its India platform, circumventing the country’s tough foreign investment rules that are aimed at protecting small Indian brick-and-mortar retailers.

The article stirred up weeks of controversy in India, sparking calls from traders to ban Amazon. The CCI said in March that the story corroborated evidence it had received against Amazon, while the Enforcement Directorate, India’s financial-crime fighting agency, asked Amazon for information and documents related to the company’s Indian operations, Reuters has reported. The CCI enforces India’s antitrust laws.

‘SENSATIONALIST LANGUAGE’

In a March 16 email to U.S. officials, including at the USTR’s office, Ingeneri wrote, in an apparent reference to the February article, that a Reuters reporter had used “sensationalist language” and relied on Amazon’s “activity before 2018 that was aggressive but not illegal at the time.” The next sentence in the email was redacted.

In response to questions from Reuters, a spokeswoman for Amazon in India said the company had no comment.

Amazon has previously told Reuters it “does not give preferential treatment to any seller on its marketplace,” and that it “treats all sellers in a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory manner.”

But internal Amazon documents show that the e-commerce giant discounted its fees to certain sellers on its platform, and that a few dozen of Amazon’s more than 400,000 sellers in early 2019 accounted for about two-thirds of the e-commerce site’s online sales.

The note prepared for Kerry summarized the Reuters story’s findings. Among them: that Amazon senior executive Jay Carney had been advised by colleagues in 2019 not to disclose to India’s ambassador in Washington that two sellers on Amazon’s Indian website accounted for a large chunk of its sales. Amazon holds indirect equity stakes in those sellers.

From 2009 to 2011, Carney served as President Biden’s communications director when Biden was vice president, before going on to serve as press secretary to President Barack Obama. The note for Kerry identified Carney as “Amazon Senior Vice President and former Obama Administration spokesman.”

Carney had no comment for this article, the Amazon spokeswoman said.

Under the headline “If Asked: Allegations of Amazon E-Commerce Violations,” the note stated: “We have seen a February 17 Reuters report raising concerns about U.S. e-commerce companies’ practices in India and note many of the allegations have been previously reviewed by the Competition Commission of India without any negative findings.” The email with the note was marked “SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.”

“The Reuters article repeated prior allegations made by small traders,” the note stated. The partially redacted note also stated that “since 2013, Amazon has invested over $5.5 billion in India, employs 100,000 Indians, and supports 400,000 vendors on its market.”

India’s strict foreign investment rules for e-commerce have caused friction between Washington and New Delhi, and frustrated U.S. firms with online businesses in India, such as Amazon and Walmart Inc.

The CCI in January 2020 launched a probe into Amazon on allegations it was favoring certain sellers, but the investigation has been on hold as the company mounted a court challenge. A separate antitrust complaint by a group of online sellers filed against Amazon is currently pending review by the CCI.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra and Steve Stecklow. Editing by Peter Hirschberg.)

Categories: News
Tags: Amazon, BI, challenge, government, news

About Reuters

Primary Sidebar

E-mail Newsletter

Sign up to receive email updates daily and to hear what's going on with us!

Publish
AN Article
Submit
a press release
List
AN Event
Create
A Job Post

Jobs

  • Software Engineer | South Yorkshire, GB - February 07, 2023
  • Software Engineer with C# .net Investment House | London, GB - February 07, 2023
  • Senior Java Developer | London, GB - February 07, 2023
  • Software Engineer – Growing Digital Media Company | London, GB - February 07, 2023
  • LBG Returners – Senior Data Analyst | Chester Moor, GB - February 07, 2023
More Jobs
Host your website with Managed WordPress for $1.00/mo with GoDaddy!

Tags

AI Amazon analysis analytics app application Artificial Intelligence BI Big Data business China Cloud Companies company costs crypto customers Data design development digital environment experience future Google+ government information learning machine learning market mobile Musk news Other public research sales security share social social media software strategy technology twitter

News

  • ‘Power, influence, notoriety’: The Gen-Z hackers who struck MGM, Caesars
  • BYD says talk of leaked commercial secrets ‘purely rumours’
  • EU considering whether to attend Britain’s AI summit, spokesperson says
  • India’s Lava looks to corner a third of feature phone market
  • Amazon to roll out ads on Prime Video in 2024
More News

Related Online Courses

  • Oracle Cloud Data Management Foundations Workshop
  • Data Science at Scale
  • Statistics with Python
More courses

Footer


Datafloq is the one-stop source for big data, blockchain and artificial intelligence. We offer information, insights and opportunities to drive innovation with emerging technologies.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent

  • 5 Reasons Why Modern Data Integration Gives You a Competitive Advantage
  • 5 Most Common Database Structures for Small Businesses
  • 6 Ways to Reduce IT Costs Through Observability
  • How is Big Data Analytics Used in Business? These 5 Use Cases Share Valuable Insights
  • How Realistic Are Self-Driving Cars?

Search

Tags

AI Amazon analysis analytics app application Artificial Intelligence BI Big Data business China Cloud Companies company costs crypto customers Data design development digital environment experience future Google+ government information learning machine learning market mobile Musk news Other public research sales security share social social media software strategy technology twitter

Copyright © 2023 Datafloq
HTML Sitemap| Privacy| Terms| Cookies

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

In order to optimize the website and to continuously improve Datafloq, we use cookies. For more information click here.

Dear visitor,
Thank you for visiting Datafloq. If you find our content interesting, please subscribe to our weekly newsletter:

Did you know that you can publish job posts for free on Datafloq? You can start immediately and find the best candidates for free! Click here to get started.

Not Now Subscribe

Thanks for visiting Datafloq
If you enjoyed our content on emerging technologies, why not subscribe to our weekly newsletter to receive the latest news straight into your mailbox?

Subscribe

No thanks

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Marketing cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!