By Paresh Dave and Stephen Nellis
(Reuters) – Epic Games on Monday will try to overturn portions of a court ruling in an antitrust trial last year that largely favored Apple Inc.
The “Fortnite” creator sued Apple in 2020 alleging that the iPhone maker’s App Store rules, under which software developers must pay commissions of up to 30% on in-app purchases, violated U.S. antitrust law.
After a three-week trial last year, a judge largely sided with Apple, stopping short of dubbing the company an “illegal monopolist” and upholding its right to charge the commissions.
But the judge did find that Apple violated its home state of California’s unfair competition law and ordered the company to let developers tell users how to make app purchases outside of its proprietary payment system.
Apple appealed the order, and Epic appealed the finding that Apple did not violate antitrust laws. The two sides will argue their case before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Monday, with representatives from the U.S. Department of Justice and the state of California also making appearances to describe relevant laws.
According to its court filings, Epic plans to argue that the trial judge did not properly interpret U.S. antitrust laws. In particular, the trial judge ruled that Apple’s contracts with developers to use its App Store did not violate antitrust laws because they were non-negotiable agreements – developers either agreed or could not use the App Store. Epic argues that such standard agreements are still subject to antitrust laws.
Other large technology companies use similar agreements to guard access to their systems. The Department of Justice, which has been investigating Apple and other tech companies, asked to join the Epic appeal because it said the lower court ruling could “significantly harm antitrust enforcement beyond the specific context of this case.”
(Reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Stephen Nellis in San Luis Obispo County, California; Editing by Rosalba O’Brien)
