By Phuong Nguyen and Fanny Potkin
The planned amendments to current law will cement Vietnam, a $1 billion market for Facebook, as one of the world’s most stringent regimes for social media firms and will strengthen the ruling Communist Party’s hand as it cracks down on “anti-state” activity.
The 24-hour time frame to take down “illegal content and services” will not have a grace period, while active “illegal livestreams” must be blocked within three hours, the people said. Companies that do not meet the deadlines could see their platforms banned in the country, they added.
Social media companies have also been told content that harms national security must be taken down immediately, according to two of the people and a third source.
The amendments, which have not been made public, are expected to be signed by Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh next month and enforced from July, five people said.
Sources who spoke with Reuters for this article declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue. Vietnam’s communications and foreign ministries did not respond to requests for comment.
TikTok, which is owned by China’s ByteDance, will continue to comply with applicable local laws to ensure TikTok remains a safe space for creative expression, its Vietnam representative Nguyen Lam Thanh told Reuters, adding it would take down content that breaks platform guidelines.
Most governments do not have laws imposing the taking down of content on social media firms, but Vietnam’s move comes amid intensifying crackdowns in some parts of the world on online content that have alarmed activists.
Indonesia’s government is also preparing to impose a similar 24-hour time frame for government requests, sources have told Reuters.
India requires government requests to be met within 36 hours.
A MAJOR MARKET
The country generates around $1 billion in annual revenue for Facebook and is more profitable than many European markets, according to sources familiar with the matter.
YouTube has 60 million users in Vietnam and TikTok has 20 million, according to 2021 government estimates. Twitter is not as popular as most Vietnamese see it as an English forum.
But the market poses ethical quandaries. Vietnam’s Communist Party tolerates little criticism and the country’s courts have handed out lengthy jail terms to dissidents and activists for posts critical of the government on Facebook and YouTube.
Government efforts to exert control over online content have only intensified. A cybersecurity law introduced in 2019 was followed up by national guidelines on social media behaviour in June last year.
In 2020, Facebook agreed to significantly increase the censorship of “anti-state” posts for local users after Vietnamese authorities slowed traffic to its platform and threatened to shut it down entirely, company sources have previously told Reuters.
Facebook said at the time it had reluctantly complied with the government’s request to “restrict access to content which it has deemed to be illegal”.
HARD TO IMPLEMENT
The planned changes stem from the government’s dissatisfaction with current take-down rates for its requests, the sources said.
According to data from Vietnam’s communications ministry, during the first quarter of 2022, Facebook complied with 90% of the government’s take-down requests, Alphabet complied with 93% and TikTok complied with 73%.
The sources said in addition to removing “illegal” content, the government wants social media firms to change algorithms to limit content concerning sexually suggestive material, gambling and the sale of unregulated medicines and supplements.
The government is also keen to take down accounts of celebrities it believes are using their influence to sell unsuitable products, defame others and promote false charitable causes, they said.
Social media firms will have difficulty complying with take-down requests in 24 hours, the sources added.
They noted that while obvious infractions of their own company rules like depictions of extreme violence can be handled very quickly, other requests take longer to assess and finding qualified staff is a challenge.
(Reporting by Phuong Nguyen in Hanoi and Fanny Potkin in Singapore; Editing by Edwina Gibbs)